STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDUCATION U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS v. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH AND 3 OTHERS
SPLAD/32/2025 · 2025-01-30
Attau Rahman Masoodi, Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120053 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 120053 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 1 Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 32 of 2025 Appellant :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Respondent :- Pankaj Kumar Singh And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- C.S.C. Counsel for Respondent :- Girish Chandra Verma Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Order on C.M. Application No.1 of 2025
1. The appeal has been filed with reported delay of 278 days. It is accompanied with an application for condonation of delay.
2. The cause shown in the affidavit filed in support of an application for condonation of delay is sufficient.
3. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
Order on Appeal
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
5. The instant intra-court appeal is directed against an interlocutory order.
6. The appeal is instituted with the delay of nine months that too against an interim order. Counter affidavit has already been filed before the writ court. Sri G.C Verma,
learned counsel for the respondent undertakes to file rejoinder affidavit within one week from today.
7. Once the pleadings have been exchanged, the matter deserves to be decided finally.
8. The writ court is expected to consider the appellant's application for vacation of interim order at the earliest or decide the writ petition finally.
9. With the aforesaid observation, the special appeal is
disposed of. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) (Attau Rahman Masoodi,J.)
Order Date :- 30.1.2025/Shahnaz Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench