Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2908 CRL.P No. 201511 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.201511 OF 2024 (439(2)(Cr.PC)/483(3)(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH YADARMI POLICE STATION, YADARMI TALUKA, RAICHUR DISTRICT, REP. BY THE ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, KALABURAGI.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI JAMADAR SHAHABUDDIN, HCGP) AND:
1.
GURANNA S/O SHIVARAYA, AGE:56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MURGANOOR VILLAGE, TQ. YADRAMI, DIST. KALABURAGI.
2.
SHIVALINGAPPA S/O GURANNA, AGE:32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MURGANOOR VILLAGE, TQ. YADRAMI, DIST. KALABURAGI.
3.
SHIVANAND S/O GURANNA, AGE:29 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MURGANOOR VILLAGE, TQ. YADRAMI, DIST. KALABURAGI.
Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2908 CRL.P No. 201511 of 2024
4.
SRIPATHIRAYA S/O SHIVARAYA, AGE:58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MURGANOOR VILLAGE, TQ. YADRAMI, DIST. KALABURAGI.
5.
MAHANTAPPA S/O SHIVARAYA, AGE:51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MURGANOOR VILLAGE, TQ. YADRAMI, DIST. KALABURAGI.
6.
SIDDAMMA W/O GURANNA, AGE:51 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O MURGANOOR VILLAGE, TQ. YADRAMI, DIST. KALABURAGI.
7.
MADIWALAPPA S/O KALYANAPPA DODAMANI, AGE:45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MURGANOOR VILLAGE, TQ. YADRAMI, DIST. KALABURAGI.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439(2) OF THE CR.PC. PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 04.01.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAICHUR IN CRIME NO.178/2023 OF YADRAMI POLICE STATION AND CONSEQUENTLY CANCEL THE BAIL GRANTED BY THE LEARNED SESSIONS JUDGE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2908 CRL.P No. 201511 of 2024
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) Perused the records.
2. The State has preferred the present petition under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C. seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused persons for the offence punishable under Section 3(1) (r) (s) of the SC/ST (PA) Act, 1989.
3. In a matter of this nature, Act is a stand alone statute which provides for an appeal under Section 14(a) of the SC/ST (PA) Act. Therefore, the present petition is per se not maintainable. Further, the office objection raised in regard to the maintainability of the present petition is not cured despite granting sufficient opportunity. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not maintainable.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4 CT:PK