Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 120012 (ALL)

RAMDEYI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/763/2025 · 2025-01-29

Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5964-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 763 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramdeyi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Mr. Deep Narayan Tripathi, learned Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party no. 5 and filed vakalatnama which is taken on record. 2. Heard. 3. The petitioner alleges interference in his possession in violation of status quo order passed in Second Appeal No. 117 of 2002, by the opposite party no. 5 in connivance with the district officials. 4. Learned standing counsel says that the land in question is a minjumla gata and the private opposite party no. 5 is also in possession. 5. Counsel for the opposite party no. 5 denies any illegal act. 6. The remedy is either in the pending second appeal or by taking recourse to any other process as may be prescribed in law. 7. This petition is not maintainable, certainly not under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in view of the disputed questions of fact involved. The petition is dismissed with liberty aforesaid. [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 29.1.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench