Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12000 (RAJ)

DEEPU S/O HARIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3918/2025 · 2025-04-07

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:15492] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3918/2025 1. Deepu S/o Hariram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Shripura, Police Station Nahargarh, District Baran (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Baran) 2. Sonu S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Shripura, Police Station Nahargarh, District Baran (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Baran) 3. Surendra S/o Mohan Lal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Shripura, Police Station Nahargarh, District Baran (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Baran) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Poonia, PP, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Sandu for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 07/04/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.06/2025 registered at Police Station Nahargarh (Baran), District Baran for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) and 352 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner No.1 Deepu S/o Hariram, does not want to press the present criminal misc. bail application and seeks liberty to file afresh after filing of the charge-sheet. [2025:RJ-JP:15492] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3918/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner Nos.2 and 3 submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the main allegation of causing injuries to injured Ramprasad and Mahaveer are against other co- accused Golu, Dheeraj and Deepu and not against the present petitioners. The accused-petitioners are in custody since 04.03.2025, and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the accused-petitioners along with the other co- accused caused injuries to injured Ramprasad and Mahaveer, as a result of attack, Ramprasad sustained grievous injury at his head resulting into fracture of frontal bone on right side with extension into right frontal sinus and base of anterior cranial fossa. The injuries sustained to other injured Mahaveer are also at vital part, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be dismissed. 5. Heard and perused the material available on record. 6. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. The specific allegations of causing injuries to injured Ramprasad and Mahaveer are attributed to petitioner No.1 Deepu and other co-accused Golu and Dheeraj, therefore, considering the above facts, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner Nos.2 and 3 on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:15492] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3918/2025] 7. Accordingly, the bail application of the accused-petitioner Nos.2 and 3 under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 2. Sonu S/o Hari Singh and 3. Surendra S/o Mohan Lal, in connection with FIR No.06/2025 registered at Police Station Nahargarh (Baran), District Baran shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The bail application of the accused-petitioner No.1 Deepu S/o Hariram is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh after filing of the charge-sheet. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/278