Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11999 (RAJ)

VIMAL KUMAR S/O VED RAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3900/2025 · 2025-07-21

Uma Shanker Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27102] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3900/2025 Vimal Kumar S/o Ved Raj, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Nangla Dungar, Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Its PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 21/07/2025 This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.666/2021 registered at Police Station NEB, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 420 & 406 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that charge sheet has been filed. Learned counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since 05.03.2025 and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:27102] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3900/2025] Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that charge sheet has been filed, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused- petitioner Vimal Kumar S/o Ved Raj shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DANISH USMANI /71