2025:JHHC:24539-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2142 of 2023 ------ 1. Tarsius Tirkey aged about 53 years Son of Anjlus Tirkey resident of Mardanpur, Moktama, P.O. and P.S. Chatra District Chatra. 2. Ashok Bhagat aged about 44 years Son of Vishnu Bhagat, Village Rakasi P.O. Unta, P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. …. …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra, P.O. and P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. 3. The Additional Collector, Chatra, P.O. and P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. 4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Chatra, P.O. and P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. 5. The Circle Officer, Chatra, P.O. and P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. 6. APN Developers and Stone Private Limited through its Director Amit Kumar Sahay Son of Srikant Kumar Sahay resident of Village Awal P.O. Chatra, P.S. Sadar, District Chatra. 7. Jay Shiv Construction through its occupier Braj Kishore Tiwari Son of not known resident of Village Chatniya P.O. Kolhaiya P.S. Rajkut, District Chatra ..... .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shray Mishra, AC to AG ------ 07/Dated: 20.08.2025 1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking therein for the following reliefs: - “(a) For issuance of an appropriate writ, order, direction especially in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to cancel the mining lease issued in favour of the respondent no.6 and 7 which has been issued violating the norms required for issuance of mining lease. (b) For issuance of an appropriate writ, order, direction especially in the nature of 2025:JHHC:24539-DB 2 mandamus commanding upon the respondent authorities to immediately and forthwith cancel the mining operation over the land for which lease has been given in favour of the respondent no.6 and 7.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after some argument, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to search out their remedy as available. 3. There is no opposition on the part of the learned State Counsel. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the writ petitioners to search out their remedy. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) Rohit/-