Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:1147 CRL.P No. 201592 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.201592 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
VEERANGOUDA K., S/O BASANAGOUDA, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. NEAR SANTE BAZAR, MASKI, TALUK: MASKI, DISTRICT: RAICHUR-584 124. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. R.S.LAGALI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH THE SHO, SADAR BAZAR P.S., RAICHUR, REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI-585 102.
2. SHRENIKRAJ, S/O DHOOLCHAND, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. OLD BAZAR, SINDHANUR, DISTRICT: RAICHUR-584 128. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.B.YADAV, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. SHIVANAND V. PATANASHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:1147 CRL.P No. 201592 of 2024
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C.(OLD) UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS, PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER OF TAKING COGNIZANCE AND ISSUE OF PROCESS DATED 19.08.2019 PASSED BY HONOURABLE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC-II COURT, RAICHUR IN CRIMINAL CASE NO.746/2019 (ARISING OUT OF RAICHUR SADAR BAZAR P.S., CRIME NO.71/2018) FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 465, 468, 471, 420 OF IPC AGAINST HIM PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1 State and the learned counsel for respondent No.2.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court can give a time bound direction to the Trial Court to dispose of the matter, since this matter has already been considered by this Court earlier in Crl.P.No.201425/2019 vide
order dated 10.11.2021 and the offences invoked against the petitioner is for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 465, 468, 471, 420 read with Section 34 of IPC having considered the accusations made against the petitioner of conspiracy, creation of documents and cheating.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:1147 CRL.P No. 201592 of 2024
3. The learned High Court Government Pleader also submits that a time bound direction may be given.
4. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that it takes time since there are voluminous documents to be placed before the Trial Court.
5. Having considered the nature of accusation and the offences invoked, it is appropriate to direct the Trial Court to dispose of the matter within a time bound period of one year from today. The respective learned counsel are directed to communicate this order forthwith to the concerned Court for expeditious disposal of the matter as directed by this Court.
6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
MD