Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11991 (UTT)

GYANENDRA KUMAR v. SEEMA RANI

WPMS/2900/2019 · 2025-09-26

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.2900 of 2019 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Shivam Gulati, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Ankur Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. None present for the respondent. 3. It is informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present writ petition has rendered infructuous for the reason that the dispute between the parties has already been settled. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 26.09.2025 AK