Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11991 (RAJ)

MANGILAL S/O RAMKISHAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3895/2025 · 2025-05-07

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19219] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3895/2025 1. Mangilal S/o Ramkishan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Chachoda, Police Station Chhabara, Distt Baran. Rajastan (Petitioner Are In Sub Jail Chhabara) 2. Lalchand S/o Danmal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Chachoda, Police Station Chhabara, Distt Baran. Rajastan (Petitioner Are In Sub Jail Chhabara) 3. Rakesh S/o Danmal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Chachoda, Police Station Chhabara, Distt Baran. Rajastan (Petitioner Are In Sub Jail Chhabara) ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ali Mohd. Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 07/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.60/2025 registered at Police Station-Chhabara, District-Baran for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that though allegation against the petitioners is [2025:RJ-JP:19219] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3895/2025] that they attacked on the complainant with sharp edge weapon but no grievous injury caused to the complainant. Even the alleged injuries are not on the vital part. Charge-sheet has been filed. Petitioners are behind the bars since 06.02.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Mangilal S/o Ramkishan, Lalchand S/o Danmal and Rakesh S/o Danmal shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each of them to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/78