APHC010141182018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 6210/2018 Between: 1. SRI S.B. PRABHAKAR RAO, SON OF S.B JANARDHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCCUPATION RETIRED EMPLOYEE, RESIDENT OF DANDI VEEDHI, SRIKAKULAM, ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CO-OPERATION, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REGISTRAR, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKU1ARN DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2nd Respondent in not reinstating the Petitioner into service for continuing him in service till he attains age of 60 years by invoking Section 115(d) of Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act,1964 as illegal, arbitrary and against principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of the Act No.4 of 2014 dt.27.06.20.14 and also contrary to the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court order Dt.09-08-2017 in C.A.10278 of 2017 to 10370 of 2017 (SLP 14033-14034 of 2017) and consequently, direct the respondents to re-induct the petitioner in service till he attains the age of 60 years into the 2nd respondent-Society and also grant all consequential benefits arising there from, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VSRMV PRASAD SANAKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2nd Respondent in not reinstating the Petitioner into service for continuing him in service till he attains age of 60 years by invoking Section 115(d) of Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 as illegal, arbitrary and against principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of the Act No.4 of 2014 dt.27.06.20 14 and also contrary to the directions of the Honble Supreme Court order Dt.09.08.2017 in C.A.10278 of 2017 to 10370 of 2017 (SLP 14033-14034 of 2017) and consequently, direct the respondents to reinduct the petitioner in service till he attains the age of 60 years into the 2nd respondent- Society and also grant all consequential benefits arising there from in the interest of justice and pass.....” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Cooperation appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 6210 of 2018 25.06.2025 Mjl /*