Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1199 (PNJ)

JIMMY MALHOTRA v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DIVISION

CWP/12594/2026 · 2026-04-24

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Jimmy Malhotra Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division, Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Present : Mr. for the Mr. for the respondent. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division, Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib the legal notice dated 11.08.2025 petitioner. 2. Learned counsel has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of wi decision on the the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all affected parties receipt of a copy of this order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. April 24, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.200 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12594 Date of Decision : Jimmy Malhotra Versus Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division, Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Mr. Shubham Bhardwaj, Advocate, or the petitioner. Mr. Sagar Ratusaria, Advocate, for the respondent. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division, Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib-the sole respondent legal notice dated 11.08.2025 (Annexure P Learned counsel for the respondent, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to decision on the legal notice dated 11.08.2025 (Annexure P , by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of affected parties, preferably within py of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 6 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 12594-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 24.04.2026 …Petitioner Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division, Mandi …Respondent DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division, Mandi respondent to take a decision on (Annexure P-9), made on behalf of the , who appears on advance notice, Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the th a direction to the respondent to take a (Annexure P-9), made on behalf of , by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of , preferably within four weeks from the date of Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.05.01 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document