Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 119887 (ALL)

PRADEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/711/2025 · 2025-01-29

Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6081-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 711 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradyumn Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A., who appears on behalf of State-respondents. 2. This petition has been filed with the following prayers :- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned First Information Report No. 0004/2025 dated 08/1/2025 lodged by opposite party No. 4 in under sections 2, 3(1) U.P. Gangster & Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986 at police station-Purwa, District-Unnao relates to the petitioner as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition. (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite party Nos. 2 to 4 not to arrest the petitioner on the basis of the impugned First Information Report No. 0004/2025 dated 08/1/2025 lodged by opposite party No. 4 in under sections 2, 3(1) U.P. Gangster & Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986 at police station-Purwa, District- Unnao relates to the petitioner, as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned FIR has been lodged only on the basis of two criminal cases in which the petitioner has been bailed out by the court concerned on 28.07.2023, copy of bail orders have been filed as annexure nos.3 and 4. 4. From a perusal of the gang chart, we find that two criminal cases have been registered against the petitioner and the sponsoring officer as well as approving authority have followed the Rules in granting approval to such gang chart and while approving the gang chart, they have gone through the file and the records placed before them. Before coming to a conclusion that such FIR need to be lodged against the petitioner. 5. We find no good ground to interfere in the matter. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. Order Date :- 29.1.2025 Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench