Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11988 (RAJ)

ABDUL MAJID KHAN S/O LATE ASHIK KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/5953/2025 · 2025-05-12

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19935] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5953/2025 Abdul Majid Khan S/o Late Ashik Khan, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Plot No. 43, Opposite Swaran Jayanti Park, Khasra No. 202, Gurjaron Ki Dhani, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Urban Development And Housing Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur. 3. Deputy Commissioner, Zone-2, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur. 4. Commissioner, Nagar Nigam Greater, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Joshi, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/05/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the writ petition, on 07.05.2025, a fresh notice under Section 72 of the Jaipur Development Authority Act, 1982 has been issued by Jaipur Development Authority (in short ‘JDA’) to the petitioner. Objections/reply is to be filed by 13.05.2025. Counsel thus, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition as petitioner intends to file reply/objection to the notice before the JDA. Permission sought for is granted. [2025:RJ-JP:19935] (2 of 2) [CW-5953/2025] Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, it is hereby directed that till conclusion of proceedings pursuant to the notice under Section 72 of the Jaipur Development Authority Act, 1982, the Enforcement Officer, Zone- 2, JDA, Jaipur is directed not to dispossess the petitioner. The Enforcement Officer is further directed to pass a speaking and reasoned order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. It is further observed that in case of dismissal of the objections of the petitioner, the Enforcement Officer shall give four weeks’ time to the petitioner to assail the order passed by him. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/41