NHAI vs. Karma and another OMP(M) No.99 of 2024 30.07.2025 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.Yuyutsu Thakur, Advocate for the respondents. OMP(M) Nos. 190 & 191 of 2025 Proposed legal representatives of respondent No.1 have been served and are represented by Mr.Yuyutsu Thakur, Advocate. The applications are not opposed. Accordingly, the prayers made in the applications are granted. The delay in bringing on record of legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1 is condoned and the legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1 as detailed in para 3 of the application are brought on record as respondents No.1(a) to 1(e). Both the applications stand disposed of. OMP(M) Nos. 192 & 193 of 2025 Proposed legal representatives of respondent No.2 have been served and are represented by Mr.Yuyutsu Thakur, Advocate. The applications are not opposed. Accordingly, the prayers made in the applications are granted. The delay in bringing on record of legal representatives of deceased respondent No.2 is condoned and the legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1 as detailed in para 3 of the application are brought on record as respondents No.2(a) to 2(e). Both the applications stand disposed of. OMP(M) No.99 of 2024 The legal representatives of original respondents No.1 and 2 have been impleaded as party respondents No.1(a) to 1(e) and 2(a) to 2(e). Learned counsel for representing all the respondents has submitted that he has no objection in allowing the application by condoning the delay in filing the appeal. In view of the concession granted on behalf of the respondents as also on the basis of averments made in the application which appears to be bonafide, the application is allowed. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Arb. Appeal No. of 2025 Admit. Notice. Mr.Yuyutsu Thakur, Advocate appears and accepts notice on behalf of all the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that name of respondent No.1(d) has been wrongly mentioned by the appellant and her correct name is Neena, whereas, it has been wrongly mentioned as Neelam Kumari. Registry is directed to make necessary corrections and the appellant is also directed to accordingly correct the memorandum of parties. OMP No. of 2025 Be registered. Notice. Mr.Yuyutsu Thakur, Advocate appears and accepts notice on behalf of all the non- applicants/respondents. The application is disposed of with direction that operation of impugned judgment dated 29.08.2023 passed by the learned District Judge, Mandi in Arbitration Petition No.54 of 2019 shall remain stayed, subject to the applicant/appellant depositing the entire award amount along-with up-to-date interest accrued thereon in the Registry of this Court within six weeks. ( Satyen Vaidya ) Judge July 30, 2025 (naveen)