RIJAVAN KHAN v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. CHIEF PASSPORT OFFICER ROOM NO 27 PATIYALA HOUSE NEW DELHI AND ANOTHER
WRIC/802/2025 · 2025-02-06
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119879 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119879 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7617-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 802 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rijavan Khan Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Chief Passport Officer Room No 27 Patiyala House New Delhi And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Furkan Pathan,Jitendra Kumar Tripathi,Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. Let the petitioner implead S.H.O., Police Station-Aasivan, District-Unnao as opposite party no.3 during course of the day.
3. Petitioner seeks issuance of passport, however, the police verification report requisitioned by opposite party no.2 is adverse in the sense that it mentions about a criminal trial pending against the petitioner arising out of Crime No.0262/2020 under Sections-504, 323, 324 I.P.C., P.S.-Asivan, District- Hardoi. Petitioner's counsel says that though chargesheet has been filed in the said case but petitioner's name does not figure therein. Petitioner relies upon a certified copy of the chargesheet which is annexed as Annexure no.5 to the petition. The submission is that there were two accused initially, both named Rijavan Khan but father of the one i.e. the petitioner was Jaheer Khan whereas father of the other was Munna. Chargesheet has been filed against Rijavan Khan son of Munna and not Rijavan Khan son of Jaheer Khan.
4. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the newly impleaded opposite party no.3 to send a fresh police verification report to opposite party no.2 within fifteen days specifically indicating as to whether petitioner is named in the chargesheet which has been filed in the aforesaid case or not. Petitioner i.e. Rijavan Khan son of Jaheer Khan is mentioned in the chargesheet or not and whether any investigation against the petitioner in respect of this case is still pending. Opposite party no.2 may also requisition a fresh report in the light of our order. Consequences will follow accordingly as per rules. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 6.2.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench