Bhoomireddy Ramgopal Reddy v. Smt. Boggula Padmavathi
WA/340/2024 · 2025-03-10
K Manmadha Rao, R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11987 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11987 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
\ ■ i IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO^ AND THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO- WRIT APPEAL NO: 340 OF 2024 Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to allow the Writ Appeal by setting aside the order dt. 15-7-2022 passed in W.P.No. 29150 of 2021 on the file of the High Court. ^ Between: Bhoomireddy Ramgopal Reddy, S/o Veera Reddy, aged about 54 years, Occ: Business, R/o.Kamballe Village and Post, Simhadripuram Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. ...APPELLANT/{THIRD PARTY> AND Smt. Boggula Padmavathi, W/o.Murali Mohan Reddy, aged about 68 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o D.No. 4-7-261, State Bank Colony, Pulivendula Town, YSR District. Smt. Yeturi Gowri, W/o. Ravinatha Reddy, aged about 45 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o Kapu Street, Rapur, Nellore District. Smt. S.Tulasi, W/o. Pratap Reddy, aged about 41 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Cillakondayapalli Tadimarri Mandal, Anantapuram District. 1. 2. 3. 4. Smt. N.Vijaya, W/o. Ragunatha Reddy, aged about 38 years, Occ: Housewife, R/ D.No. 1/15, Naguru, Kadapa City, YSR Kadapa District. Smt.Boggula Sushmitha, D/o Boggula Pulla Reddy, aged about 33 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Flat No.516, Block No.2, B.K.Singj^ Towers, Near New Ayyappa Swamy Temple, Kurnool. 5. f
6. The State of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department (Stamps and Registration) Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 7. The Commissioner & Inspector General of Registration & Stamps, A.P., 7CVJ CWF, Nagarapaalem, Guntur, A.P.
8. The Sub-Registrar, Pulivendula, YSR District. ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order passed in W.P.No. 29150 of 2021 dt.
15-7-2022, in the interest of justice, r- Counsel for the Appellant: SRI J.JANAKIRAMI REDDY _ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: SRI V.R.REDDY KOWURI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 7:
GP FOR STAMPS & ^ REGISTRATION The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010139962024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3525] MONDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO: 340/2024 Between: ...APPELLANT Bhoomireddy Ramgopal Reddy AND ...RESPONDENT(S) Smt Boggula Padmavathi and Others Counsel for the Appellant:
1.J JANAKIRAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) 2.VR REDDY KOWURI The Court made the following Judgment: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. RaghunandanRao) The writ petitioners herein, claiming title over Ac.6.03 cents of land in of Chinarangapurarn Village, Pulivendula Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, had sold under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, Ac.6.03 cents of land situated in various surveys of Chinarangapurarn Village, of Y.S.R. various surveys
2 RRRJ & Dr.KMRJ W.A.No.340of2024 Kadapa District to one Sri Pulla Reddy. Subsequently, his legal heirs, who are writ petitioners herein, had presented the document of alienation for registration. The Sub-Registrar, Pulivendula, by an endorsement, dated 18.10.2021, had refused to register the same. Aggrieved by the said endorsement of rejection, the writ petitioners approached this Court, by way of W.P.No.29150of2021. A learned Single Judge of this Court, after hearing the writ petitioners as well as the respondent authorities was pleased to dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction to the Sub-Registrar to receive, register and release the
2. document. Aggrieved by the said judgment, the writ appellant, who is a third party to the Writ Petition has approached this Court, by way of the present Writ
3. Appeal.
The case of the writ appellant, in short, is that the title to the said land can be traced to Sri V. Bhaskar Rami Reddy and Sri Venkata Rami Reddy, who are brothers. It is the case of the appellant that the land in question belonged to Sri Venkata Rami Reddy, who had sold the land to the appellant. However, Sri V. Bhaskara Rami Reddy, who had no title to the said land mortgaged the property to M/s. A.P.S.F.C., which sold away the land for recovery of dues from Sri V.Bhaskara F^ami Reddy. The writ appellant would contend that, in view of the running dispute relating to this property, he has filed, O.S.No.86 of 2023 before the learned IV Additional District Judge,
4. 3 RRR,J & Dr.KMR,J W.A.No.340of2024 Kadapa District, and an ad-interim injunction order, in I.A.No.1120 of 2023, in O.S.No.86 of 2023, had also been issued, on 18.12.2023, injuncting the writ petitioners/respondents herein from alienating any part of the said land. The appellant would also contend that, in such circumstances, registration of a sale deed in favour of the writ petitioners/respondents would go against the essence of the injunction granted by the learned IV Additional District Judge, Kadapa District, in O.S.No.86 of 2023. C
5. Sri V. R. Reddy Kovvuri,
learned counsel for the writ petitioners/respondents would contend that the land belongs to Sri V. Bhaskara Rami Reddy and the execution of mortgage over the said land in favour of M/s. A.P.S.F.C. and subsequent sale of M/s. A.P.S.F.C. is in accordance with law.
6. It is submitted by Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned counsel for the writ petitioners/respondents that the deed of sale presented by M/s. A.P.S.F.C. has already been registered in favour of the writ petitioners and the document has also been released.
7. In these circumstances, this Writ Appeal is disposed of holding that the registration of the said sale deed will be subject to the result of the suit. In the event of the suit being allowed in favour of the writ appellant, the deed of sale registered as document No.3289 of 2023, in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Pulivendula,shall stand cancelled. If the suit is dismissed, in favour of the writ petitioners/respondents, nothing further needs to be done.
4 RRR,J & Dr.KMRJ W.A.No.340 of 2024 The same result would apply to any Appellate Proceedings that may be
8. initiated by either side against the Orders of the learned IV Additional District Judge, Kadapa District, in relation to O.S.No.86 of 2023. There shall be no
order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- Wl.RANlESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The IV Additional District Judge, Kadapa District.
2. The Principal Secretary Revenue Department (Stamps and Registration), State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Buildings^ Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.
3. The Commissioner & Inspector General of Registration and Stamps A.P., 7CVJ CWF, Nagarapaalem, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.
4. The Sub-Registrar, Pulivendula, YSR District.
5. One CC to Sri J.Janakirami Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] ^
6. One CC to Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvuri, Advocate [OPUC]
7. Two CCs to GP for Stamps & Registration, High Court of Andhra^ Pradesh. [OUT]
8. Three CD Copies. gi
w HIGH COURT DATED:10/03/2025
ORDER WA.No.340 of 2024 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS