SURESH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA v. UNION OF INDIA ANDORS
CW/3690/2010 · 2025-02-10
Sudesh Bansal
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11986 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11986 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:5652] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3690/2010
1. Suresh Chandra Srivastava son of Late Shri H. D. Srivastava, resident of 47-B Devi Path, Takhat-e-Shahi Road, Jaipur (Since Deceased through Legal Representatives) 1/1. Smt. Shireen Srivastava wife of Late Shri Suresh Chand Srivastava, aged 76 years, Resident of 47-B Devi Path, Takhat- e-Shahi Road, Jaipur 1/2. Smt. Vineeta Srivastava daughter of Late Shri Suresh Chand Srivastava, aged 49 years, Resident of 47-B Devi Path, Takhat-e-Shahi Road, Jaipur 1/3. Smt. Smita Srivastava daughter of Late Shri Suresh Chand Srivastava, aged 48 years, Resident of 47-B Devi Path, Takhat- e-Shahi Road, Jaipur 1/4. Siddharth Srivastava son of of Late Shri Suresh Chand Srivastava, aged 41 years, Resident of 47-B Devi Path, Takhat- e-Shahi Road, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus
1. Union Of India through Secretary Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India, 4th Floor, "A" Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.
2. General Manager the Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Registered Office at Oriental House, A-25/27, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi.
3. Regional Manager the Oriental Insurance Company Limited, 3rd Floor, Anand Bhawan, Sansar Chandra Road,Jaipur
4. Bar Council of Rajasthan, through its Chairman, Rajathan High court Campus, Jodhpur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Sharma for Mr. Sandeep Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Virendra Agarwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 10/02/2025
1. Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners also of on behalf of Insurance Company, jointly submits that the dues claimed by the original petitioner on account of his legal fee against the
[2025:RJ-JP:5652] (2 of 2) [CW-3690/2010] Insurance Company have been cleared and now no issue survives in the instant writ petition for adjudication on merits.
2. In view of above, instant writ petition is disposed of as rendered infructuous.
3. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /94