RAJENDER KUMAR v. MANAGING DIRECTOR HRTC AND OTHERS
CMP/17699/2025 · 2025-08-21
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11985 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11985 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Rajender Kumar Vs. HRTC & Ors. CMP No.17699 of 2025 in Execution Petition No.1225 of 2024 21.08.2025 Present: Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswa,, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for the non- applicants/ respondents. When the case was taken up for consideration today, the Court stands apprised that in order dated 28.07.2025, presence of the parties has been wrongly marked. As there is a typographical error in the said order, as far as learned Counsel are concerned, it is ordered that a fresh order be prepared for the said date in which name of Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, learned Counsel, be reflected as learned Counsel for the applicant/ petitioner and name of Mr. Vinod Gupta, learned Counsel be reflected as learned Counsel for the non-applicants/ respondents. Learned Counsel for the non-applicants/ respondents has handed over a copy of order dated 20.08.2025, passed by the Authority concerned, in terms whereof, representation filed by the petitioner has been rejected. Accordingly, the application is disposed of, with
liberty to the applicant/ petitioner to assail the said order, if required. The copy of Office Order dated 20.08.2025, which was handed over by learned Counsel for the non-applicants/ respondents has been handed over to learned Counsel for the applicant/ petitioner. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August
21 , 2025
(Rishi)