Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:11233
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 1805 of 2025 Sahil Goyal S/o Shri Manoj Goyal, Aged About 20 Years Profession - Student, R/o Agrasen Ward, Ambikapur, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Police Station Gandhinagar, Ambikapur, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh. ... Non-Applicant For Applicant : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. U.K.S. Chandel, Dy. Advocate General. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 06/03/2025 1 The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 12/2025, registered at Police Station – Gandhinagar, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 308(5) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2 The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 03.01.2025, the complainant, namely, Sekhar Agrawal has lodged an FIR No. 12/2025 PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI
2 at Police Station – Gandhinagar, Ambikapur against three unknown people with the allegation that on 02.01.2025 at about 11:00 am, three unknown people had visited the shop (Ravi Marble and Tiles) of the complainant and have made extortion by putting the complainant in fear of death and have extorted Rs. 25,000/-. 3 It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that due to rivalry and the competition of business, the complainant had lodged the false case against the applicant and applicant is a student and is pursuing 1st Year B.A.. He also submits that the applicant has no previous criminal antecedents and the charge-sheet has been filed and the applicant is in jail since 24.01.2025 and trial is likely to take quite long time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of bail. 4 On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposed the bail application and submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case. 5 I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record.
6 Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal antecedents and the charge-sheet has been filed and he is in jail since 24.01.2025 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I am inclined to allow this application. 7 Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant - Sahil Goyal, involved in Crime No. 12/2025, registered at Police
3 Station – Gandhinagar, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 308(5) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of
4 statement under Section 351 of BNSS.
If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8 Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Preeti