Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 119826 (ALL)

SIDDHARTH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PRIN. STAMP REGISTRATION DEPTT. GOVT. LKO AND 5 OTHERS

/1022/2025 · 2025-01-27

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5093 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1022 of 2025 Petitioner :- Siddharth Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Stamp Registration Deptt. Govt. Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Mansoor,Mohammad Danish Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Raj Kumar Upadhyaya (R.K.Upadhyaya) Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Mohd. Mansoor, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner has superannuated from the post of Assistant Inspector General, Registration and the grievance which subsists even after his superannuation is with regard to third annual carrier progression (ACP) which was to be granted to the petitioner on completion of 26 years of service which has not been given to him. 3. It is stated that third ACP became due on 26.06.2023 but no decision in this regard was taken. The petitioner has superannuated on 30.06.2023. 4. In this regard, it has been submitted that petitioner has given a representation dated 22.11.2024 to the respondent which is pending consideration and has not been decided so far. 5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 1 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22.11.2024 (Annexure No. 1) in a time bound manner. 6. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondent for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 1 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22.11.2024 (Annexure No. 1) expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him in accordance with law and in case the respondents come to a conclusion that petitioner is entitled for third ACP, the same shall be paid to him along with arrears expeditiously, say, within a period three weeks from the date of passing of the order on the representation of the petitioner. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 27.1.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench