Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 119823 (ALL)

SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

/959/2025 · 2025-01-24

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4697 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 959 of 2025 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sachin Upadhyay,Amandeep Singh,Piyush Raj Verma,Shivendra S Singh Rathore Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents No.1, 2 & 4, Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 and Shri Arun Kumar holding brief of Shri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5. No notice is required to be issued to respondent No.6 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. 2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that father of the petitioner namely Late Ramesh Chandra Yadav who was working as Peon under respondent No.6-Institution, which is a basic school governed under the provisions of Basic Education Act, died in harness on 18.04.2024. The petitioner stakes his claim for compassionate appointment. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.5 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.5 then the respondent no.5 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. 6. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 24.1.2025/prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench