Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 119819 (ALL)

SARJU AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DIST. MAGISTRATE SITAPUR AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/808/2025 · 2025-01-30

Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6500-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 808 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sarju And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Dist. Magistrate Sitapur And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Nath Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. Petitioners alleges encroachment on their bhumidhari land by opposite party nos.5 and 6 who are private parties. Therefore, the writ petition qua any dispute with private opposite parties is not maintainable. However, if the said construction is being undertaken under some project of government or government agency then the petitioners may approach the said agency who shall look into the matter and ensure that bhumidhari land of the petitioners is not encroached unless it is acquired or purchased. 3. With these observations, we dispose of this petition. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 30.1.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench