APHC010140042025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9051/2025 Between: Bhupathi Eswara Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. REDDY VENKATA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: NV,J W.P.No.9051 of 2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9051/2025 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “...to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature in WRIT of MANDAMUS to declaring the action of the Respondents in did not considering to application by way of Mee Seva dt 02.12.2023 vide application No.MLPM231202015711, also applications dt.13.02.2024 to under Form 6A dt.13.02.2024 to the 4th respondent for agricultural land for an extent of Acres 3-90 cents in Sy. No.24/0 situated at Jamadala Vill,age Parvathipuram Mandal, Parvathipuram Manyam District (which is already in the name of petitioner’s mother) as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principals of natural justice and contrary to the Andhra Pradesh Revenue Act and also violation of Articles 300-A, 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to conduct the survey of the agricultural land for an extent of Acres 3-90 cents in Sy.No.24/0 situated at Jamadala Village, Parvathipuram Mandal, Parvathipuram Manyam District, (which is already in the name of petitioner’s mother) and to pass...” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 3. The claim of the petitioner is that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the subject property, having acquired the same through succession from his ancestors. Even though, the petitioner made an application dated 13.02.2024 under Form 6A to the 4th respondent, the respondents neither considered the application nor issued any proceedings. Hence, the present Writ Petition. NV,J W.P.No.9051 of 2025 4. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents submits that the claim of the petitioner should be considered, since appropriate application was submitted by the petitioner and also in I-B Adangal reflects the name of the petitioner’s mother. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by both the learned counsel and on perusal of the material placed on record, this Court is of the opinion that the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to consider the Form-6A dated 13.02.2024 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of three (03) months from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 08.04.2025 LLSSPP NV,J W.P.No.9051 of 2025 160 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9051/2025 08.04.2025 LLSSPP