Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 119808 (ALL)

SHREE PRAKASH DWIVEDI AND ANOTHER v. UOI THRU. MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS NEW DELHI AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/1097/2025 · 2025-02-07

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7967 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1097 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shree Prakash Dwivedi And Another Respondent :- Uoi Thru. Ministry Of Railways New Delhi And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dilip Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 to provide the suitable employment to Akshya Dwivedi Petitioner no.2 son of Petitioner no.1 under the scheme of land looser in the establishment of the Modern Coach Factory, Lalganj, Raebareli. (II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.3 to decide the application of the petitioner dated 12.02.2021 to provide the suitable employment to Akshya Dwivedi son of petitioner under the scheme of land looser in the establishment of the Mordern Coach Factory, Lalganj, Raebareli as contained in Annexure No.2 to this writ petition. (III) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 to decide the application of the petitioner dated 19.02.2021 to provide the suitable employment to Akshya Dwivedi son of petitioner under the scheme of land looser in the establishment of the Modern Coach Factory, Lalganj, Raebareli as contained in Annexure No.4 to this writ petition." 3. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned counsel appearing for the respondents that since the matter relates to the appointment in the railway, the same is not cognizable by this Court and the matter is cognizable by the Central Administrative Tribunal. 4. In view the same, I am not inclined to entertain the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. [Manish Kumar Nigam,J.] Order Date :- 7.2.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench