Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No . Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
C482 No.1928 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, learned counsel or the applicants.
2. Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal and Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned Brief Holders for the State.
3. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
4. By means of this present C482 application, the applicants have challenged the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2003 of 2022, State vs. Ravi @ Ravindra & another, under Sections 452, 323, 354, 504 & 506 IPC, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal.
5. Learned counsel for the applicants has limited his prayer to the extent that applicants may be permitted to surrender before the court concerned within fifteen days; however, their bail applications may be directed to be decided.
6. He also placed reliance upon the authority of Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773. For the sake of convenience, relevant portion thereof is quoted hereinbelow:- 3.Category A(e) Bail applications of such accused on appearance may be decided without the accused being taken in physical custody or by granting interim bail till the bail application is decided.
7. In such view of the matter, present C482 application is disposed of permitting the applicants to surrender before the concerned court on or before 03.03.2025; if on surrender any bail applications are moved on their behalf, the court concerned is directed to decide the same in view of dictum of the Apex Court in the case of Satender
Kumar Antil (Supra).
8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
17.02.2025 AK