Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 119760 (ALL)

HARSHITA SAHU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. ENERGY LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/906/2025 · 2025-02-06

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7699-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 906 of 2025 Petitioner :- Harshita Sahu Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravendra Pratap Singh,Lakhi Ram Badoni Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Aprajita Bansal Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. After arguing the matter at some length, counsel for the petitioner reconciled to apply for one time settlement which is prevalent as of now i.e. if it is so prevalent. 3. The petitioner may approach the opposite party no. 4 in this regard with an application who may process the same, if there is a scheme, and do the needful. If the applicant is required to apply on a proper format after completion of certain formalities, then, the opposite party no. 4 shall apprise the same to the petitioner and thereafter the petitioner shall complete the same. Let this exercise be completed within a period of three weeks. 4. The petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 6.2.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench