Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 119740 (ALL)

YASHOMATI MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BAL VIKAS EVAM PUSTAHAR LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/1103/2025 · 2025-01-28

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5511 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1103 of 2025 Petitioner :- Yashomati Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Bal Vikas Evam Pustahar Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harsha Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner is working on the post of Mukhya Sahayika in the Directorate of Bal Vikas Sewa Evam Pustahar. The grievance raised in the present writ petition is with regard to grant of the benefit of 2nd ACP which according to the petitioner was payable to the petitioner from 22.01.2023 despite representation made to respondents, no decision has been taken nor has the benefits been paid to the petitioner and accordingly by means of present writ petition, it has been prayed that respondents be directed to grant the benefit of 2nd ACP and revise her Grade Pay to Rs. 4600/-. 3. In this regard, it has been submitted that petitioner has given a representation dated 30.08.2024 to the respondent which is pending consideration and has not been decided so far. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 30.08.2024 (Annexure No. 12) in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondent for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 30.08.2024 (Annexure No. 12) expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 28.1.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench