Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11974 (AP)

VAMANA POOJITHA v. Union of India

WP/8397/2020 · 2025-09-09

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010139652020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8397/2020 Between: 1. VAMANA POOJITHA, D/O VAMANA CHITTI BABU, AGE. 3, THROUGH HER GRAND FATHER VAMANA SURYANARAYAN, AGED 75 YRS OCC. SENIOR CITIZEN, R/O BURIDI KANCHARAM (V), PONDUR (M), SRIKAKULAM (D) 2. VAMANA SURYANARAYAN, AGE. 75 YRS, OCC. SENIOR CITIZEN, R/O . BURIDI KANCHARAM (V), PONDUR (M), SRIKAKULAM (D) ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY PRL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. 2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI 3. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY TO GOVT, DEPT OF HOME AND PRISONS, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI 4. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS, VISAKHAPATNAM 5. COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 6. SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL PRISON, VISAKHAPATNAM 7. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 8. SHO, J.R. PURAM P.S, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not granting Parole/Furlough to the father of the first Petitioner since 2018 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of various judgments of apex court and article 21 of Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to release the father of the first Petitioner on Parole/furlough in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. DR D V RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N INDRANI 2. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8397 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not granting Parole/Furlough to the father of the first Petitioner since 2018 as illegal arbitrary violation of various judgments of apex court and article 21 of Constitution of India and pass.…” 2. Sri D.V.Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the instructions from the party, they wanted to withdraw this Writ Petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 10th September, 2025 RKS