Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11971 (AP)

K VIMALA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/7306/2024 · 2025-09-03

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010139772024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7306/2024 Between: 1. K VIMALA, W/O K. RAVI KUMAR, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO. 1-98/IOC, THUMALAGUNTA VILLAGE ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATHI. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TIRUCHANURU POLICE STATION, TIRUCHANURU, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 4. M LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY, , S/O. LATE ANNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.20-1018, COOPERATIVE COLONY, KADAPA TOVM, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAJENDRA C Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7306 of 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering the crime on petitioners repeated complaints dated 11.11.2023, 13.11.2023, 25.12.2023 and 05.01.2024 against the 4th respondent and his bench men on the file of 3rd respondent, as illegal, discharge of legal obligation irregular, irrational, amounts to non conferred on them under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the crime and prosecute the accused persons for appropriate offences and penal provisions of law and pass such.…” 2. Heard Sri Rajendra C, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that no crime has been registered on the complaint of the petitioner, since the subject matter is of civil in nature. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before the appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.09.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.7306 of 2024 Dated.04.09.2025 UPS 148