SUPRAKANDI FISHERMAN CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS
WP(C)/2509/2025 · 2025-06-11
Michael Zothankhuma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11966 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11966 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010096442025
2025:GAU-AS:7681
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2509/2025 SUPRAKANDI FISHERMAN CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD PO-GIRISHGANJ BAZAR ,DIST-SRIBHUMI ,ASSAM, PIN-788711, AND REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN MD.BASHIR ALI AND THE SECRETARY SRI KIRTI SUNDAR ROY VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER-SECRETARY, FISHERY DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 6 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SRIBHUMI DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI ASSAM 3:THE DISTRICT FISHERY DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SRIBHUMI. SRIBHUMI DISTRIC Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHAKRAVARTY, A BORA,A SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FISHERY,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER Date : 12.06.2025 Heard Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the respondents have not taken a decision for settlement of Kakra Nadi fishery, pursuant to the NIT dated 08.11.2023. He also submits that there was
Page No.# 2/2 only one bidder pursuant to the NIT dated 08.11.2023.
2. Mr. P. Sarmah, learned counsel for the Fishery Department submits that the respondents will take a decision as to whether there is going to be a re- tender or as to whether the settlement is to be made, pursuant to the NIT dated 08.11.2023 within 15 days.
3. Ms. U. Das, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 2.
4. In view of the submission made by Mr. P. Sarmah, learned counsel for the Fishery Department, the Fishery Department should take a decision with regard to whether they are going to re-tender or to make a settlement, pursuant to the NIT dated 08.11.2023, within a period of 15 days from today. The decision should thereafter be communicated to the petitioner.
5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant