Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 119652 (ALL)

RAM JAGE v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. CHAIRMAN U.P. POWER CORP. SHAKTI BHAWAN 14 ASHOK MARG LKO. U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/792/2025 · 2025-01-30

Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6506-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 792 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Jage Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Chairman U.P. Power Corp. Shakti Bhawan 14 Ashok Marg Lko. U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Neera Yadav Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard Shri Shiv Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Rakesh Kumar Yadav holding brief of Mrs. Neera Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 6. Learned counsel for the Electricity Corporation says that One Time Settlement Scheme is prevalent and the petitioner may get his dues settled under said scheme, however, learned counsel for the petitioner says that he had applied for the same but the said application was not accepted. The petitioner should approach the opposite party no. 4 or 5, as the case may be, alongwith an application who may consider the same as per law and take a decision promptly. Let the aforesaid decision be taken on the application of the petitioner aforesaid within a period of four weeks. Till the decision is taken, the impugned recovery certificate shall not be implemented, however, if the application of the petitioner is not accepted i.e. if it is rejected, then, consequences shall follow as per law and it shall be open for the petitioner to challenged the same. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 30.1.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench