VIJAY KUMAR v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2781/2025 · 2025-10-06
Sanjay Dhar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11963 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11963 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2781/2025 CM No. 6370/2025
Vijay Kumar
…..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abid Khan, Advocate
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors.
.….Respondents
Through: Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Assisting Counsel to Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG for R-1 Ms. Chetna Manhas, Assisting Counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-2 and 3
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER (06.10.2025)
01. The grievance of the is that the respondent No. 3- Tehsildar, Atholi (Paddar), is not taking a decision on the issue with regard to grant of Schedule Tribe certificate in favour of the petitioner after the matter was remanded to him by respondent No. 2-Deputy Commissioner, Kishtwar.
02.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the statutory period for deciding such matters is 15 days but despite the lapse of said period, respondent Serial No. 208
2 WP(C) No. 2781/2025
No. 3- Tehsildar, Atholi (Paddar), is not taking a decision in the matter.
03. Having regard to the nature of the grievance that has been projected by the petitioner in this case, the present petition is disposed of, at this stage by issuing appropriate direction to respondent No. 3-Tehsildar, Atholi (Paddar), to decide the case with regard to the grant of Schedule Tribe certificate in favour of the petitioner expeditiously in accordance with law preferably within a period of 15 days from the date a certified copy of this order is made available to respondent No. 3 i.e. Tehsildar, Atholi (Paddar).
04.
Disposed of.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU
06.10.2025
SUNIL
Whether the order is speaking ? : Yes
Whether the order is reportable ? : No