NARWADA Versus STATE OF HP AND OTHERS CWP-7795 of 2025 05.09.2025 Present: Mr. Hitender Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.5. While placing on record communication dated 29.08.2025, issued under the signatures of Superintending Engineer, 11th Circle HPPWD, Rampur Bushahr, learned Additional Advocate General states that in terms of the mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be complied with, husband of the petitioner has been granted work charge status vide order dated 29.08.2025 after completion of 8 years of daily wage service w.e.f. 01.01.2004. He states that though work charge status has been granted to the petitioner w.e.f. 01.01.2004 on completion of 8 years of daily wage service on notional basis, but service rendered on work charge status shall be counted for the purpose of pensionary benefits. He states that as and when amount on account of Government contribution/dividend paid on account of retiral benefit is deposited, appropriate action for grant of pensionary benefits shall be taken. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same are closed. September 05, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge