INDIRA SINGH v. HINDUSTANT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED
WPMS/154/2025 · 2025-06-30
Ravindra Maithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1196 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1196 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 52
WPMS No.154 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. Ms. Menka Tripathi, Advocate for the respondent no.1, through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the license of the petitioner was only for a period of three months; the period has already expired. Now the petitioner has already applied for renewal of the license. In view of it, it is stated that the petition has rendered infructuous. In view of the statement given by
learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition. It stands disposed of, accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
30.06.2025 RV