Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 119562 (MAD)

K.Muthuraj v. The State of Tamil Nadu

CRL OP(MD)/2157/2025 · 2025-02-03

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.2157 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.02.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Crl.O.P(MD)No.2157 of 2025 K.Muthuraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Thiruthangal Police Station, Virudhunagar District. 4.T.Dharamajeyaseeli ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S Act, 2023 r/w 482 of Cr.P.C to direct the respondents 2 and 3 thereby directing not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and pass such further or other orders as this Court. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.2157 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kishore Kumar For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner and the fourth respondent are husband and wife and there is a family dispute pending between them. Due to which, she lodged a false complaint and based on the complaint, the respondents 1 and 2 are harassing the petitioner. She also filed a petition before the Sub Court, Sivakasi in H.M.O.P.No.17 of 2025 and the same is pending. Therefore, the petitioner filed the present petition. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the official respondents would submit that based on the complaint given by the fourth respondent herein, they conducted enquiry and thereafter, they closed the 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.2157 of 2025 petition. Since there is a family dispute pending between the parties, both the parties can approach the Family Court for appropriate relief. Therefore, they have not registered any case against the petitioner and they have not harassed the petitioner. 4. Recording the above said submissions of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the official respondents, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 03.02.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.2157 of 2025 3.The Inspector of Police, Thiruthangal Police Station, Virudhunagar District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.2157 of 2025 P.DHANABAL, J. BTR Crl.O.P(MD)No.2157 of 2025 03.02.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis