Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11956 (UTT)

SUDAMA PRASAD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1631/2025 · 2025-10-17

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:9355 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS 1631/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Abhishek Singh Rawat, Advocate, i/b Mr. Mahendra Singh Rawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deputy AG, for the State. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent no. 2. (2) Petitioner served as Pump Operator in Uttarakhand Payjal Nigam and retired on 31.3.2025. According to him, amount payable as leave encashment and dearness allowance has not been paid to him so far, therefore, by means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to the employer to clear his dues. (3) Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Counsel appearing for Uttarakhand Payjal Nigam, on instructions, submits that the entire amount payable as gratuity has been released to petitioner, however, due to financial crunch, the amount payable as leave encashment and dearness allowance could not be paid so far. He assures the Court that remaining payment would be made to petitioner as early as possible. (4) Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by directing the Managing Director, Uttarakhand Payjal Nigam to release entire admitted dues to petitioner within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 17.10.2025 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.10.17 16:41:06 +05'30' 2025:UHC:9355