SABEENA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.AND ANOTHER
/71/2025 · 2025-01-24
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119553 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119553 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4889 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 71 of 2025 Applicant :- Sabeena Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajesh Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Sri Rajesh Kumar Shukla, advocate, has put in appearance by way of filing vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2 and the same is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajesh Kumar Shukla, counsel for opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 1139 of 2024, under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506, 307 of IPC P.S.- Kotwali District - Barabanki. From perusal of the first information report as well as the record, it transpires that the applicant is the second wife and once the informant had executed the power of attorney in the name of the applicant and on the basis of same, she executed certain sale deed and has misappropriated the amount in her favour and once the informant returned back and had canceled the power of attorney, even then, the applicant on the basis of canceled power of attorney, had executed the sale deed and committed cheat & fraud and when this was objected by the informant, he was beaten thus, this Court do not find any good ground to intervene in this matter.
Learned counsel for the applicant has failed to satisfactorily substantiate that the applicant would not tamper the evidences and would not threaten the witnesses. Apprehension of arrest has also been denied. Considering the complicity of the accused and the gravity of offence, the instant anticipatory bail application is hereby dismissed. Consigned to records.
Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Mayank Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench