Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11955 (AP)

Dasiri Srinivas Rao v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/6109/2019 · 2025-08-06

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010139782019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6109/2019 Between: 1. DASIRI SRINIVAS RAO, S/O. D.VENKAT SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O .D .NO10-29/1, MAILARAYI CENTER, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. 2. DASIRI AMBICA, W/O. D.SRINIVAS RAO, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O .D .NO10- 29/1MAILARAYI CENTER, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT) SECRETARIAT, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHAVANIPURAM, POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.. 4. D VENKAT SUBBA RAO, S/O. LATE BALLAYYA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O .D NO.2-9-19, QUARTER NO 31 LABOUR COLONY, VIDYADHARPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed action of the 3rd Respondent and his Subordinates in detaining the Petitioners in the 3rd Respondent Police Station for hours together under the pretext of a complaint given by the 4th Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Article 14, 19, 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to harass the Petitioners by calling them to the Police Station without following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to harass the Petitioners by calling them to the Police Station without following due process of law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M RAJESWARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6109 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 01.08.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 07.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6109 of 2019 Date: 07.08.2025 PSA