Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11951 (AP)

Galla Geetha, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/6152/2019 · 2025-09-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010140262019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6152/2019 Between: 1. GALLA GEETHA,, W/O GALLA RAJA SEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC - BUSINESS. RESIDENTS OF DOOR NO. 39-8-94/1, 201, HILL PARK APARTMENT, MURALI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 2. GALLA RAJA SEKHAR,, S/O G. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC - EMPLOYEE. RESIDENTS OF DOOR NO. 39-8-94/1, 201, HILL PARK APARTMENT, MURALI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 3. GALLA SAI GANESH,, S/O GALLA RAJA SEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC - BUSINESS RESIDENTS OF DOOR NO. 39-8-94/1, 201, HILL PARK APARTMENT, MURALI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANDAPURAM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. SMT MUTYALA SANTHI SREE, W/O MUTYALA SURESH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC - BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO. 10-45, KARANAMVARI STREET, PORANKI VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 32, BASALT ST, TOWN SEND, DE 19734, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, E-MAIL SSMUTYALA ALIAS YAHOO.COM, C/O. MUTYALA NAGABHUSHANA RAO, S/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 14-45, KARANAMGARI STREET, PORANKI VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. MUTYALA SURESH, S/O. SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 10-45, KARANAMVARI STREET, PORANKI VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 32, BASALT ST, TOWN SEND, DE 19734, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, REP.BY HIS GPA HOLDER MUTYALA NAGABHUSHANA RAO, S/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 14-45, KARANAMGARI STREET, PORANKI VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. MUTYALA NAGABHUSHANA RAO, S/O. SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 14-45, KARANAMGARI STREET, PORANKI VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. DWARAMPUDI SAIYEESH REDDY ALIAS SAI SRIREDDY, S/O AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, R/O. MIG-2, FLAT NO. 352, RAJEEV NAGAR, KURMANNAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 3 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in registering a crime in FIR No. 182/2018, dt. 09.09.2018 against the 7th respondent only by leaving the respondents 4 to 6 as accused and not investigating into the matter properly on the complaint lodged by the petitioners dt. 09.09.2018 is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of fundamental principles enshrined under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent- Police to include the respondents 4 to 6 as accused in Cr.No. 182/2018, dt. 09.09.2018 and investigate the matter on the complaint lodged by the petitioners dt. 09.09.2018 and provide police protection to the petitioners and their property situated in Plot No. 6, Visakhapatnam Industrial Park, Gambheeram, Visakhapatnam District, from the hands of the unofficial respondents and their henchmen, IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to include the names of the respondents 4 to 6 as an accused in Cr.No. 182/2018, dt. 09.09.2018 and investigate into the matter, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, 4 IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAJESH MATCHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SRAVAN KUMAR MANNAVA 2. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3. SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6152 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri Rajesh Matcha, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 04.09.2025 PSA 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6152 of 2019 Date: 04.09.2025 PSA