Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 119498 (ALL)

SURENDRA MOHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ U.P. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/747/2025 · 2025-01-29

Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5998-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 747 of 2025 Petitioner :- Surendra Mohan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj U.P. Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard Shri Anil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. The petitioner alleges encroachment of his bhumidhari land bearing Gata No. 607 situated at village- Rudrapur Bisen, Pargana- Gonda, Tehsil, District- Gonda by the opposite party no. 6 who is undertaking construction of Government Nali/ Nala, as the case may be. Let the petitioner initiate proceedings for demarcation of his bhumidhari land bearing Gata No. 607. As a result of such demarcation once the boundary is demarcated the consequences will follow accordingly as per law, meaning thereby, if the petitioner finds that there is an encroachment on his land he can initiate proceedings for its removal or for that matter the opposite party no. 6, unless he challenges the demarcation, would also be obliged to do the same unless an agreement is arrived at between the parties for purchase/ sale of the said land or it is acquired as per law. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 29.1.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench