Crl.R.C.(MD)No.699 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.R.C.(MD)No.699 of 2025 Chandran ... Petitioner Vs. Kumar ... Respondent Prayer : Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 438 r/w 442 of BNSS, 2023 to call for the records of the Impugned Judgment passed in Crl.A.No.188 of 2023 dated 10.07.2024 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Thanjavur @ PattukKottai confirming the Judgment passed in S.T.C.No.64 of 2022 dated 10.07.2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court (FTC), Pattukkottai and set aside the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Paranjothi for M/s.KBS Law Office For Respondent : Mr.B.Santhanam Rajesh Kumar ORDER This Criminal Revision Case has been filed, assailing the judgment in Crl.A.No.188 of 2023 on the file of the learned III Additional District 1/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.699 of 2025 and Sessions Court, Thanjavur @ PattukKottai, dated 10.07.2024, confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the judgment dated 10.07.2023 in S.T.C.No.64 of 2022 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court (FTC), Pattukkottai and acquit the accused. 2. The case of the respondent/complainant is that on 29.01.2021, the petitioner borrowed a loan of Rs.5,00,000/- from the respondent agreeing to repay the same within a period of 2 months and had issued a cheque bearing number 996725, dated 29.03.2021. When the respondent has presented the cheque for collection, the same was returned with reason “Insufficient funds” on 09.04.2021, that the respondent has sent legal notice on 22.04.2021 to the petitioner demanding repayment of the amount covered by the cheque and the same was returned. Therefore, the respondent has filed a private complaint for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against the petitioner. 3.The complaint was taken on file by the learned Judicial Magistrate Court (FTC), Pattukkottai, as S.T.C.No.64 of 2022. The learned Trial Court convicted the petitioner on 10.07.2023, for the 2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.699 of 2025 offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for 6 months and to pay a sum of Rs.5,10,000/- as compensation within a period of 2 months, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 2 months. Challenging the above said conviction and sentence, the petitioner has filed an appeal in Crl.A.No. 188 of 2023 on the file of the III Additional and District Sessions Court, Thanjavur @ Pattukottai and the learned III Additional and District Sessions Court, Thanjavur @ Pattukottai, by confirming the conviction and sentence, dismissed the appeal. Being dissatisfied with the dismissal of the appeal, the petitioner has preferred the present Criminal Revision. 4. The matter is referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre and the mediation report is placed before me. The settlement agreement arrived at between the parties is extracted hereunder: 3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.699 of 2025 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.699 of 2025 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.699 of 2025 5. The parties have appeared before this Court and the Demand Draft drawn to a tune of Rs.98,000/- in favour of Kumar s/o Jeyaraman was handed over to the respondent. 6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ramgopal and another v. State of Madhya Pradesh1, had held that this Court, in exercise of inherent powers, can accept the compromise, even in the case of non- compoundable offences, if the parties have entered into a compromise and the dispute is private in nature. 7. Though the petitioner is the accused of the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, the dispute is private in nature. Hence, this Court is inclined to accept the settlement and set aside the order of conviction and sentence imposed by the Courts below. 8. Accordingly, the settlement agreement dated 12.08.2025, is taken on file. The Criminal Revision Case is allowed in terms of the settlement agreement dated 12.08.2025. The conviction and sentence imposed upon the petitioner vide judgment dated 10.07.2024, in 1 (2022) 14 SCC 531 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.699 of 2025 Crl.A.No.188 of 2023 on the file of the learned III Additional and District Sessions Court, Thanjavur @ Pattukottai, confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the judgment dated 10.07.2023 in S.T.C.No.64 of 2022 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court (FTC), Pattukkottai, is set aside and the petitioner is acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount which has been deposited to the credit of S.T.C.No.66 of 2022 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court (FTC), Pattukkottai on making a suitable application. 26.08.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No gbg To 1.The III Additional and District Sessions Court, Thanjavur @ Pattukottai. 2.The Judicial Magistrate Court (FTC), Pattukkottai. 7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.699 of 2025 L.VICTORIA GOWRI ,J. gbg Order made in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.699 of 2025 Dated: 26.08.2025 8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis