RANI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TRANSPORT DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS
/996/2025 · 2025-01-27
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119471 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119471 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5173 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 996 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rani Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Diwakar Pratap Pandey,Shyam Narayan Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 and Shri Ratnesh Chandra,
learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 to 4. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for following main reliefs:
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to decide the representation dated 06.01.2025 made to opposite party no.3 to grant the benefit of A.C.P dues as given to similarly situated persons like Sri Arun Kumar Pandey Senior Clerk Gonda Depot vide order No. 2461 dated 15.07.2022 passed by Regional Manager Devipatan Region and Sri Izhar Ahmad Driver Sultanpur Depot vide
order No. 3808 dated 30.08.2024 passed by General Manager Karmik Nigam Headquarter Lucknow In whose case their minor punishments (Censure Entry, recovery of financial loss caused to the corporation due to negligence and warning etc.) were ignored and stoppage of increments without future effect were not shifted which also comes under the category of minor punishments as per service rules, while providing the benefit of A.CP as per G.O. dated 22.04.2015 passed by Managing Director U.P.S.R.T.C.(Contained as Annexure No.1) preferred by the petitioner and if any dues is found admissible then the same shall be paid to the petitioner in the time bound manner. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to pay A.C.P. dues from the due date 01.12.2008 as given to similarly situated persons like Sri Arun Kumar Pandey Senior Clerk Gonda Depot vide order No. 2461 dated 15.07.2022 passed by Regional Manager Devipatan Region and Sri Izhar Ahmad Driver Sultanpur Depot vide order No. 3808 dated 30.08.2024 passed by General Manager Karmik Nigam Headquarter Lucknow In whose case their minor punishments (Censure Entry, recovery of financial loss caused to the corporation due to negligence and warning etc.) were ignored and stoppage of increments without future effect were not shifted which also comes under the category of minor punishments as per service rules,
while providing the benefit of A.CP as per G.O. dated 22.04.2015 passed by Managing Director with interest on delayed payment." After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.4 i.e. Assistant Regional Manager, Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Pratapgarh Depot which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsels for the respondents have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.4 then respondent no.4 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.
It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 27.1.2025 Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench