EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AIIMS v. CENTER OF FINDIAN TRADE UNION
WPMB/844/2025 · 2025-10-10
G Narendar, Subhash Upadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11947 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11947 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:9055-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY Writ Petition Misc. Bench No.844 of 2025 10 October, 2025
Executive Director AIIMS, Rishikesh & Others ----Petitioners
Versus
Center of Indian Trade Union and Others ----Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Saransh Kumar and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners. -------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT: (per Sri G. Narendar, C.J.)
The learned counsel for the petitioners has sought for a direction exempting the Director of AIIMS from appearing before the CGIT as directed vide its
order dated 16.09.2025.
2.
We had directed the counsel to secure instructions as to whether interim directions issued by the CGIT would be complied in letter and spirit?
3.
In the post lunch session, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has been instructed to submit that the proceedings reinstating the workers as
directed by the CGIT would be passed and the 1
2025:UHC:9055-DB
proceedings presently issued appointing them on a tenure basis would be withdrawn.
4.
In view of the said submission, we deem it appropriate to interfere with that part of the order directing personal presence of the Director. The AIIMS institute can be represented by its counsel and any other representative that Director may choose to depute. The order directing the personal presence is set aside, subject to the condition that all proceedings are drawn in a manner which compliant with the direction issued by the CGIT in letter and spirit.
5.
The observations made by this Court shall not be construed as observations on merits of the matter and all contentions regarding the merits are left open.
6.
In view of the pendency of the issue for the last more than five years, we direct the CGIT to expedite the consideration and disposal of the reference as expeditiously and at any rate within the outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order.
(G. NARENDAR, C.J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 10.10.2025 2
2025:UHC:9055-DB
KK/SS 3