Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11945 (RAJ)

LALLU LAL JAT S/O BHINWA RAM JAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/4342/2025 · 2025-03-28

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14320] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4342/2025 1. Lallu Lal Jat S/o Bhinwa Ram Jat, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 106, Nai Kothi, Israwala, Tehsil Amer, Bilochi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Shyam Sundar Sharma S/o Ramhet Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 4 Galta Valo Ki Bagichi, Ganga Pol, Jaipur City, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Girdhari Lal Sharma S/o Sita Ram Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Indra Colony, Barala Garden Ke Piche, Ward No.15, Chomu, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Dinesh Kumar Sharma S/o Dvarika Prasad Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o New Colony, Morija, Chomu, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Vishnu Dutt Sharma S/o Radheyshyam Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Aditya Nagar, Morija Road, Chomu, Tripolia, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 6. Pawan Kumar Sharma S/o Satyanarayan Sharma, Aged About 59 Years, R/o 307, Shiv Nagar 1, Murlipura Road No. 1 Ke Samne, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Ayurveda (Ayush), Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Deputy Secretary, Department of Ayurveda and Bhartiya Chikitsa (Ayush), Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Director, Nideshalay Ayurved Vibhag, Rajasthan, Ajmer Having Its Office At Ashok Marg, Savitri Chauraha, Ajmer, Rajasthan-305001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sunita Meena, AGC for Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 28/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the issue involved in this petition has already been set at rest by the [2025:RJ-JP:14320] (2 of 3) [CW-4342/2025] Division Bench of this Court in the case of Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13496/2021 on 13.07.2022. Hence, the instant writ petition be disposed of in the light of the similar directions issued in the instant case. 2. Learned counsel for the parties are also in agreement that the order passed in the aforesaid case has been upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court while deciding Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.14308-14318/2022 decided on 30.01.2024 and even the review petition with Diary No.11641/2024 has also been rejected on 15.10.2024, hence, the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma (supra) has attained finality. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on the record. 4. Looking to the aforesaid statement jointly made by the respective parties and looking to the fact that the controversy involved in this writ petition has already been set at rest by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma (supra) vide order dated 13.07.2022 and the said order passed by the Division Bench of this Court has been further upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court twice vide orders dated 30.01.2024 and 15.10.2024 and thus, the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma (supra) has attained finality. This Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant writ petition in the light of similar directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma (supra). [2025:RJ-JP:14320] (3 of 3) [CW-4342/2025] 5. Stay application as well as all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J GARIMA /1