ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. /ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/629/2025 · 2025-02-19
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119376 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119376 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10893-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 629 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Dwivedi,Anil Kumar,Vikrant Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard. Shri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous, hence, the petition be dismissed accordingly. The writ petition dismissed as having become infructuous. (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Arnima Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench