ADNAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/74/2025 · 2025-01-27
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5192 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 74 of 2025 Applicant :- Adnan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Wajahat Ali @ Vijahat Ali,Kaushal Kishor Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 297 of 2024, under sections 126(2), 191(2), 191(3), 109, 131, 190, 118(1), 117(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS, P.S.- Safipur District - Unnao.
3. From perusal of the FIR as well as the record, it transpires that the applicant is named in the FIR and the applicant including the other co-accused persons had beaten the injured persons and there are as many as four injured and the injured have received injuries, thus this Court do not find any good ground to intervene in this matter.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has failed to satisfactorily substantiate that the applicant would not tamper the evidences and would not threaten the witnesses. Apprehension of arrest has also been denied.
5. Considering the complicity of the accused and the gravity of offence, the instant anticipatory bail application is hereby dismissed.
6. Consigned to records. Order Date :- 27.1.2025 Mohd. Sharif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench