Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11933 (CHH)

KRISHNA VAISHNAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2425/2021 · 2025-07-20

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2425 of 2021 Krishna Vaishnav S/o Late Shri Sheshendra Kishordas Vaishnav Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Thana Khamhariya , Tahsil Than Khamhariya, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Kabirdham, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Sub Divisional officer (R) Kawardha District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Nayab Tahsildar Kawardha District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 5 - Smt. Vaidehi Vaishnav W/o Shri Arjun Das Vaishnav Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Chikhali, Beneath Over Bridge, Ganesh Stationary, Tahsil and District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 6 - Smt. Ratna Devi W/o Shri Shyam Kishor Das Vaishnav Aged About 66 Years R/o Gentleman Collection Main Road, Near Nilam Lodge Sitabardi Nagpur Maharashtra. 7 - Smt. Kamla Bai Vaishnav Wd/o Late Shri Tikendra Das Vaishnav Aged About 68 Years R/o Sadar Road Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 8 - Smt. Pratima Vaishnav W/o Shri Pawan Vaishnav Aged About 43 Years R/o Plot No. 49/a, Near Unique Apartment, Matri Vihar Kohka Bhilai, Tahsil and District Durg Chhattisgarh. 9 - Smt. Lalit Vaishnav W/o Shri Manish Vaishnav Aged About 42 Years R/o Sadar Road Gobra, Nawapara Rajim, Tahsil Abhanpur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 10 - Smt. Shila Vaishnav W/o Shri Som Vaishnav Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Donda, Tahsil Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- For Petitioners : Mr. Vikrant Pillai, Advocate For State : Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Additional Advocate General For Respondents No.7 to 10 : Mr. B. P. Singh, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Rishi Rahul Soni, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 21.07.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to prefer an appeal against order impugned. 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Permission granted. 4) Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated above. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge NADIM