ZYDUS HEALTHCARE LTD., MUMBAI THRU. ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ASSOCIATE MANAGER MR. URMIK GOHIL v. AMBRISH TIWARI AND ANOTHER
WRIC/686/2025 · 2025-09-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119326 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119326 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 686 of 2025 and WRIT - C No. - 10855 of 2024 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard Shri Anurag Lakhotia and Shri Shrikant Tripathi, learned counsel for petitioner as well as Shri Haresh Kumar Pardasani and Shri Arvind Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent in Writ-C No.686 of
2025.
2. The present petition have been filed challenging the order dated 04.10.2024, whereby the three issues were decided by the Industrial Tribunal. The first was with regard to the claim of the workman for passing an interim order in his favour. The second issue was with regard to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal in view of the opposition by the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shrikant Tripathi, Kirti Kar Tripathi, Touqeer Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arvind Mishra, C.S.C. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kirti Kar Tripathi, Shrikant Tripathi Zydus Healthcare Ltd., Mumbai Thru. Its Authorized Representative Associate Manager Mr. Urmik Gohil .....Petitioner(s) Ambrish Tiwari And Another .....Respondent(s) Ambrish Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Labour U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
management and the third issue decided was whether the workman would fall within the definition of workmen as prescribed in Industrial Disputes Act.
3. Considering the fact that only interim order has been passed deciding three issues, both the writ petitions are disposed of with direction to the Industrial Tribunal to decide the matter finally inter se in between the parties without giving any adjournment to any of the parties within a period of two months..
4. As both the parties are present, both of them shall appear before the Industrial Tribunal on 12th September, 2025, which said to be the date fixed. The Tribunal shall thereafter decide the matter within a period of two months without giving any adjournment to any of the parties as directed above. September 3, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 686 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench