Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 119322 (ALL)

RAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO

ABAIL/107/2025 · 2025-01-23

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4416 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 107 of 2025 Applicant :- Raj Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Ashwini Kumar Ojha,Nirmala Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on anticipatory bail in Sessions Trial No.34459 of 2024 arising out of Case Crime No.0138 of 2024, under Section 366 I.P.C., Police Station Jethwara, District Pratapgarh. From perusal of the F.I.R. as well as the record, it transpires that there is serious allegation against the applicant in the F.I.R. and that too with respect to offences against the women and the applicant is named in the F.I.R. Learned counsel for the applicant has failed to satisfactorily substantiate that the applicant would not tamper the evidences and would not threaten the witnesses. Apprehension of arrest has also been denied. Considering the complicity of the accused and the gravity of offence, this Court do not find any good ground to intervene in this matter. Consequently, the instant anticipatory bail application is hereby dismissed. Consigned to records. Order Date :- 23.1.2025 Ram Murti Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench