BHARUL ALIAS BAHRUL ALLIAS BADRUDDIN ALIAS BADRUDDIN HUSSAIN ALLIAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3488/2025 · 2025-05-02
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11929 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11929 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:13326 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3488 of 2025
------ Bahrul @ Bharul @ Badruddin @ Badruddin Hussain aged about 44 years, son of Ekramul R/o Bijli, P.O. and P.S. Malda, District-Malda (West Bengal).
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Kishore Prasad, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Snehlika Bhagat, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 02-05-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.347 of 2024 arising out of Rail Ranchi P.S. Case No.3 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 328, 379, 411, r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused person has committed theft by administering poison to the victims. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is next submitted that no T.I.P. has been conducted and without conducting any T.I.P., charge sheet has been submitted. It is next submitted that no witness has been examined as yet. It is next submitted that the co-accused person has already admitted to bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 28.01.2025 in B.A. No.9211 of 2024. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.04.2024 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-
(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-X, Ranchi in connection with S.T. Case No.347 of 2024 arising out of Rail Ranchi P.S. Case No.3 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/